Azure 社群支援 | Microsoft Azure

Hello, We are trying to manage Azure alerts, performance and abaliability from SCOM 2016 with the "new" December 2017 Management pack. When a Data Factory is runing in the subscription the resource scan crashes with the error: One or more errors occurred. Object reference not set to an instance of object. Is there any thought about fix this? Regards, Eduard.

a general "to be always notified" Email Address Field for Azure Support

I need our Support Center to be notified about all Support requests that are created in Azure. Since we are granting several Power Users the Access to the Portal and also to create Tickets it would be a nice feature that we can make sure that our Supporting Teams get informed about ANY support request created by Users.

Want to modify scale-in rule of VMSS (want to remove deallocated instance first)

I know that VM scale set(VMSS) removes instances evenly across update domains and fault domains. However, I want to customize the scale-in rule, like remove deallocated instance first. Hope there will be the function which realize above.

AAD B2C: Add support complex jwks senarios

Please allow a method of either disabling the validation of the optional parameter x5t (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7517#section-4.8) or support the validation of more complex methods as defined (https://auth0.com/docs/jwks). Our company is currently attempting to interface a client's Auth0 application as an idp with our B2C directory (via OpenID) using a custom policy. The jwks signature that is defined is producing the following error: The jwk key can't be deserialized. Reason: 'The thumbprint in the keycontainer ‘NjVBRjY5MDlCMUIwNzU4RTA2QzZFMDQ4QzQ2MDAyQjVDNjk1RTM2Qg’ does not match the certificate thumbprint ‘65AF6909B1B0758E06C6E048C46002B5C695E36B’ The solution that we have found was to short circuit the process and provide our own jwks that omits the x5t parameter and allows azure to compute this value based on its own base64 sha1 hash instead of the algorithm that is provided in the jwks. The well known metadata for this provider supplies a jwks in the following format (this is a sample that I generated from a test account the error provided is what the system would produce if fed this signing cert): { "keys": [ { "alg": "RS256", "kty": "RSA", "use":"sig", "x5c":["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"], "n": "yeNlzlub94YgerT030codqEztjfU_S6X4DbDA_iVKkjAWtYfPHDzz_sPCT1Axz6isZdf3lHpq_gYX4Sz-cbe4rjmigxUxr-FgKHQy3HeCdK6hNq9ASQvMK9LBOpXDNn7mei6RZWom4wo3CMvvsY1w8tjtfLb-yQwJPltHxShZq5-ihC9irpLI9xEBTgG12q5lGIFPhTl_7inA1PFK97LuSLnTJzW0bj096v_TMDg7pOWm_zHtF53qbVsI0e3v5nmdKXdFf9BjIARRfVrbxVxiZHjU6zL6jY5QJdh1QCmENoejj_ytspMmGW7yMRxzUqgxcAqOBpVm0b-_mW3HoBdjQ", "e": "AQAB", "kid": "NjVBRjY5MDlCMUIwNzU4RTA2QzZFMDQ4QzQ2MDAyQjVDNjk1RTM2Qg", "x5t": "NjVBRjY5MDlCMUIwNzU4RTA2QzZFMDQ4QzQ2MDAyQjVDNjk1RTM2Qg" } ]} Available @ https://auth0.com/docs/jwks

2719

票

Make it less expensive to run my very small service on Windows Azure.

2493

票

Continue Azure offering free for Developers

After February 1st 2010, it's going to be tough for developers/freelancers/hobbiest to learn, test and deploy azure applications as it's going to be billed for everything. Like Google AppEngine (http://code.google.com/appengine/whyappengine.html#norisk) Azure should provide free offering for developers with some similar limitations and if the usage goes beyond, one can enter in billing.

1444

票

IIS8 and ASP.NET 4.5 support in AZURE platform

1278

票

Reduce cloud costs, specifically storage and bandwidth

Cloud computing might be tempting when you are just starting a company because you don't need to worry about having your own infrastructure. But as you host more and more storage and demand more and more bandwidth, the current cost per GB models become pricey. There is a now-popular analogy between cars and the cloud. The current cloud offering is advantageous when you rent a car from city A to city B, but if you are traveling too often, you better buy your own. All the hype around cloud computing set aside, if the cloud is aiming at the next big thing for businesses, it better be cheaper!! Cheaper for especially large companies. When is Windows Azure going to cost less? At least, Amazon has a better-looking model in which they reduce per GB costs when the consumption rate is over a specific number. MS should provide a better solution to all-MS .NET developers.

Custom error page for Application Gateway.

I want to use custom page instead of deault error page (403) in APPGW. Use application gateway with prevent mode and SQL injection send to application gateway and then default error page (403) will be displayed. I want to use custom page instead of that default page. I hope that application gateway can have a feature to use custom page.

Recovery Service Vault, Backup storage Replication in ARM

Currently there is no way to sepcify which storage replication is wanted when you create a Recovery Services Vault via ARM templates. The default when spinning up a vault is GRS, and the only way to change it is to log into the portal and choose LRS before any backups have been applied. The fact that the type of storage replication cannot be changed after a backup has been set does not help the situation. This makes automating infrastrucutre builds painful as I have to login and change the setting in the portal before i am able to continue adding machines to the vault. The documentation for the Vault is here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/templates/microsoft.recoveryservices/vaults If this is already available then please update the docs and the Quick start templates to include it! If its not available then please add it to ARM! Quick Start Template : https://github.com/Azure/azure-quickstart-templates/tree/master/101-recovery-services-vault-create

Improvement of EA portal

Currently once the administrator sets "AO view charges" Enabled, every Account Owner come to be able to view the all charges of every subsections. We demand the improvement about the authority setting so that the Account Owners can see their own subscription's information only.

Provide a local emulator for Azure Event Hubs

When developing solutions for Azure, it is very useful to have a local development experience. This is good for development, integration tests, and validation of approaches. When using Azure Storage, Cosmos DB, or Service Fabric, there is a very good local emulator story. But for Event Hubs, there is no local emulator story, so all development and integration testing needs to use the real thing, which causes a number of issues. For example, integration tests now need to provision an isolated Event Hub, and then ensure that it gets torn down. It would be much better if we had a local emulator for Azure Event Hubs. In the style of Cosmos would be best (cross platform, general parity in features.

檢視論壇

還是找不到您想要的內容？推文

Tweet us @AzureSupport

協助我們改進。本網頁實用嗎？