Soporte técnico de la comunidad de Azure
Formule preguntas, obtenga respuestas y comuníquese con los ingenieros de Microsoft y los expertos de la comunidad de Azure
Respuesta de Microsoft a las preguntas técnicas sobre Azure
Trying to use Rest Resource in a Copy
Forum: Azure Data Factory
Some users not receiving subscription or @mention emails
Forum: Azure Stack
MARS agent fail to install during installation of MABS
Forum: Azure Virtual Machines
Forum: Azure API Management
290
Votos
Site to Site replication - ASR required?
Forum: Microsoft Azure Site Recovery
137
Votos
New SQL Database Editions Performance
Forum: Azure SQL Database
103
Votos
Forum: Azure App Service - Web Apps
68
Votos
thumbprint is invalid according to its datatype
Forum: Cloud Services (Web and Worker Roles)
7
Respuestas
Site to Site replication - ASR required?
Forum: Microsoft Azure Site Recovery
214
Respuestas
Azure AD Connect Health Sync Monitor High CPU Usage
Forum: Azure Active Directory
128
Respuestas
Report Viewer error on export PDF or Excel from Azure Web Sites
Forum: Azure App Service - Web Apps
96
Respuestas
AADSTS90033: Service is temporarily unavailable. Please retry later.
Forum: Azure Management Portal
Respuestas de la comunidad a las preguntas de desarrollo
297
Votos
140
Votos
Respuestas de la comunidad a las preguntas de administración de Sys/Net
17
Votos
¿Tiene alguna idea o sugerencia basada en su experiencia con Azure?
IPv6 support must be consistent and easy
IPv6 was designed for the minimum configuration and maximum flexibility. No NAT, flexible load balancing. It's 2019 here but IPv6 support in Azure leaves much to be desired. Specifically, do you want us to "request an IPv6 address" and "assign to the load balancer"? Really? The main principle of IPv6 is to issue the minimum of /64 block. The block must be assigned to the LB (router) and the prefix along with RDNSS must be announced using multicast. VMs must have global IPv6 connectivity. LB must have a unicast address. Azure is intended for the service and application development, not a "button clickers". Show some respect to the admins and developers and do what's right.
To have a clear documentation on SAP S/4HANA 1709 FPS01 Fully Activated Appliance 30-day free trial. Micrisift Azure Pricing Calculator does not help. Microsoft documentation on HANA is not relevant for the available free trial option.
Addressing Azure Advisor recommendations does not refresh the original list. For example, addressing Azure service notification alerts took hours after addressing to be removed from the Azure Advisor recommendations list.
TELL ME HOW CAN I, A CUSTOMER, PURCHASE WHAT I NEED FROM MICROSOFT?
I JUST NEED DIRECTIONS FOR GETTING THE SOFTWARE I NEED TO REPLACE OLD SOFTWARE. IS THERE ANY DEPARTMENT OR PERSON I COULD COMMUNICATE WITH AT MICROSOFT? I HAVE BUSINESS THAT USE MICROSOFT PLATFORMS AND APPLE PRODUCTS. I CAN'T FIND THE SOFTWARE I NEED FOR MY SPECIFIC USE WITH OUT READING HUNDREDS AND THOUSANDS OF POSSIBLE PRODUCTS ADVERTISED, TALKED ABOUT, TRENDING, OR HINTED AT ONLINE I'D JUST LIKE TO GET WHAT I NEED, PAY THE FEE AND GET BACK TO WORK. GOT ANY IDEAS, MICROSOFT? THANKS.
2488
Votos
Continue Azure offering free for Developers
After February 1st 2010, it's going to be tough for developers/freelancers/hobbiest to learn, test and deploy azure applications as it's going to be billed for everything. Like Google AppEngine (http://code.google.com/appengine/whyappengine.html#norisk) Azure should provide free offering for developers with some similar limitations and if the usage goes beyond, one can enter in billing.
1278
Votos
Reduce cloud costs, specifically storage and bandwidth
Cloud computing might be tempting when you are just starting a company because you don't need to worry about having your own infrastructure. But as you host more and more storage and demand more and more bandwidth, the current cost per GB models become pricey. There is a now-popular analogy between cars and the cloud. The current cloud offering is advantageous when you rent a car from city A to city B, but if you are traveling too often, you better buy your own. All the hype around cloud computing set aside, if the cloud is aiming at the next big thing for businesses, it better be cheaper!! Cheaper for especially large companies. When is Windows Azure going to cost less? At least, Amazon has a better-looking model in which they reduce per GB costs when the consumption rate is over a specific number. MS should provide a better solution to all-MS .NET developers.
My customer hopes that SLES 15 (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15) will be supported for Azure Site Recovery in the near future. I'd like you to consider that as soon as possible.
ensure all documents that have AZ CLI examples also have PowerShell Examples
There are many pages of documents that have only AZ CLI examples for them. For a PowerShell user this is not exactly helpful and reduces the capability of IT Pro's & Dev's to get to grips with these newer offerings Therefore please make it a requirement to have PowerShell Examples listed next to any AZ CLI examples so that those that are comfortable with PowerShell I have raised a GitHub Issue to have this tracked as well https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/13162#issuecomment-411907216
Within the Office 365 Group Expiration setup there should be a way to set it such that all groups *except* specific ones are subject to the expiration setting. As it stands now it's the other way around; all groups or only the selected ones. In an environment where users are permitted to created their own groups (something I was told even Microsoft allows) you really need the expiration feature enabled by default. But there are certainly use cases where as an admin you will want specific groups exempted from this setting.
Allow provisioned VM pricing to be altered to add software licensing without reprovisioning
As an Azure VM user/administrator, I would like to be able to take an existing VM priced at one rate, and "upgrade" the pricing to include licensing for products installed after provisioning. I would like this to provide flexibility (e.g., if I want to install SQL Server on a Windows priced VM, without losing install/configuration work already undertaken on that VM and without independently licensing SQL; or if I want to add BizTalk to a Win/SQL-priced VM). I would also like this to allow simplified compliance (e.g., a Windows-priced VM is found to have SQL Server installed after provisioning), to allow upgraded/hourly pricing to be applied to an existing VM to reflect installed Microsoft products (at least).
Abra una incidencia de soporte técnico
Envíenos un tweet a @AzureSupport
Ayúdenos a mejorar. ¿Le resulta útil esta página?